Ebook Download Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics)
Time is yours and just how you utilize your time is likewise yours. However here, we will aid you to always make use of the time extremely well. Reading a publication both from soft documents and print data can help you to make better assumption. You will certainly recognize even more concerning something brand-new. When you don't review Meditations On First Philosophy (Hackett Classics), you could not recognize and recognize about a minimum of something. However understand, by giving this suggested book, we are actually certain that you can acquire it, also at the very least something.
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics)
Ebook Download Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics)
Exactly how is your time to invest the spare time in this day? Are you starting to do a brand-new activity? Will you try to check out? Everybody understands and also agrees that reading is a great behavior. You must read as well as review, furthermore the book with several advantages. However, is that true? There are only few people who like to read. If you are just one of them, it is great for you. We will offer you a new publication that can make your life improved to be better.
We understand that you are also follower of the writer of this book. So, it will not be worse for you to select it as recommendation. Meditations On First Philosophy (Hackett Classics), as one of the essential books to review can be considered as a book that gives you something recommended. You could take the comparable subject from other publication, but the one that can provide you much better impact is this publication. This condition will really affect you to serve the reputable option.
Reserve, an among the secrets to get in the new globe always is shared in a good way. Even you truly admire of this book, you could not get anything from here. One way is just by taking the soft file of Meditations On First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) to read and also check out guide to complete. Understanding what the author utter can aid you to know and also get the benefits of this publication. So, it does not need the magic ways to obtain inspirations. It does not should take more times as well as much loan to get this book as your collection.
The writer is actually wise to choose words to use in making this book. The choices of words are essential to create a publication. It will certainly appertain to read by such certain societies. Yet among the advancements of this publication is that this publication is actually correct for each society. You may not be afraid to know nothing after reading this publication. Meditations On First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) can help you to locate lots of points after reading.
Review
The new version of Cress's translation of Descartes's Meditations has attained an unusually high degree of readability . . . and at the same time, of fidelity to the original.--Roger Ariew, University of South Florida, and Marjorie Grene (1910-2009), Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Read more
Language Notes
Text: English (translation) Original Language: Latin
Read more
See all Editorial Reviews
Product details
Series: Hackett Classics
Paperback: 72 pages
Publisher: Hackett Publishing Company; 3rd edition (October 1, 1993)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0872201929
ISBN-13: 978-0872201927
Product Dimensions:
5.5 x 0.2 x 8.5 inches
Shipping Weight: 2.4 ounces (View shipping rates and policies)
Average Customer Review:
4.1 out of 5 stars
226 customer reviews
Amazon Best Sellers Rank:
#18,735 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Make me question everything. After reading this book I questioned reality, sensations, and even my own existence. I am now trapped in the vortex of time all by myself for about 1000 years now, so I would say this is a great book. Or is it? What makes it a great book? What is a great book? What is a book? What is life? What is reality? Why am i a philosophy major? What am i going to do with my life now? Why am i writing a funny review on Amazon instead of studying for my finals so I can stop disappointing my parents?
We are 1641, Descartes or "the thinking thing", as he calls himself, is meditating about the existence of a god + telling apart soul and body. Medieval follies apart, the fun here comes from his ingenious methodology building the argument. First, he admits being aware of his ignorance therefore prone to errors. Second, he claims to be able to free his mind from senses and prejudices; also ready to demolish his own opinions given new evidences. Then he goes about defining what information his senses are providing to conclude that, in a senseless mind-set, the idea of god is still with him. I’m reading this in 2016, we know humans can’t reach such senseless state but Descartes is still very entertaining.
In the "Discourse on Method for Conducting One's Reason Well and for Searching for Truth in the Sciences" (1637) Descartes suggests that perfect knowledge can be achieved by means of perfect, individual reasoning. According to Descartes, reason can only guarantee its truth-seeking value in the personal sphere, and even then only when it is gradually and systematically applied. Descartes demonstrates his own method for generating perfectly reasoned knowledge, but it is the model of this behavior and not the knowledge itself that ought benefit his readers. The text is in this sense a testament to Descartes' own progress as a practitioner of his own method. Descartes exerts himself as the ultimate critic whose default stance is one of doubt and who wishes to reform his own thought according to the most rigorous standards of reason possible. He does not succeed in following most of his maxims. Nevertheless, his experiment is a notable instance of the struggle for individual enlightenment.First, Descartes addresses the harms of the status quo organization of knowledge and its acquisition. He identifies the vector by which falsehoods propagate themselves undetected among the disciplines of human knowledge. The current realm of human knowledge is the product of "design by committee" in the sense that it is cumulative and collaborative, meaning that previous errors in reasoning may serve as the ostensibly firm foundations for the current order of knowledge. He alleges that no discipline of knowledge can be said to be entirely reasoned from empirical data. He criticizes even the apparently objective systems of mathematics and logic for a deficiency of application. Descartes points to controversies and inconsistencies between disciplines as evidence of imperfection among the sciences, for if they were perfectly conceived, they would be a single and uniform science. In theory, these unstable foundations could be reformed at the individual level with individual reason alone.To this end, Descartes performs his own experiment, isolating himself from the order of human knowledge to the best of his ability. He recommends that the individual reasoner enter a knowledge vacuum that is void of the mental constructs with which other humans think. Like Bacon, Descartes wishes to distance himself from the logic of syllogism and abandon the "Idols of the Theater." Starting from a single absolutely true concept, if one can reason it out, one might gradually construct knowledge by the sole mechanism of pure reasoning, resulting in trustworthy and verified blocks of knowledge which have been thought out by the individual reasoner and which ideally have empirical evidence in the world. Descartes performs this role to demonstrate the solvency of the method to himself. His first building block is perhaps the first warning signal with regard to the rest of his project, but it is also one of the only reasoning sessions to which the readers have detailed access. Descartes falls short even at this primary stage because he is unable to achieve a point zero of knowledge from which to start. Beyond this, it is evident from Descartes own writing that his "good sense" frequently makes reasoned but unreasonable leaps. Indeed, readers may only ponder the interim years in which Descartes moved from his starting point of "I think therefore I am" to his much more specific "knowledge" concerning the heart. Descartes' task of operating solely by means of individual reason is both impossible and inadvisable. Furthermore, his project is a performative contradiction: the notion of individual reason opposes the adoption of collectively achieved knowledge, yet the text serves the very purpose of intruding upon the reader's individual sphere of reason. But, for all of this project's weaknesses in practice, Descartes' project shifts the responsibility and procedure of enlightenment away from the elite class of thinkers into the domain of the autonomous reasoner.
A book well worth reading for anyone interested in the history of philosophy, but even moreso for those interested in Christian theology. Herein is the basis for most Protestant Christian interpretations of Jesus and the Bible. Descartes provides those who agree with him certainty about a discrete Self that has 'free will,' and a God who 'is not a deceiver' thus rendering our perceptions and rational thought trustworthy. I disagree with him most every step of the way, but it is a fascinating read given its impact on the historical development of philosophy and western religion.
At my undergraduate university I was forced to taken to humanities electives and was ordered to read this in one of them....and I actually ended up loving it! Book was of good quality and was much cheaper than my local bookstore at my university. As far as content goes, I would say that this book changed the way that I perceived the world around me. Previous to read this book, I was a biochemistry major who only focused on getting my scientific studies done to further my science education. By the time I finished this book I (as corny as it sounds) felt much more cultured and actually was inspired to read other books of philosophical nature. I am very glad with this and for the price of about $10 I doubt that you can do any better than Decartes! Enjoy!
If you pick up this book thinking it exists, take a moment to clear your head of all you know to be true. To truly immerse yourself in this book, you must put aside all you know and take in every word as if it were knew knowledge. This book is a great place to start for aspiring students of philosophy.
One of the fathers of Dualism, or the belief that the body and soul are two different entities. Extremely complex to read, but fascinating at the same time.
We are in 1637, Descartes is explaining his method to define a stable basis for all knowledge. Hats off to his frankness on mastering the mediocrity of his mind also aware of the short duration of life. The man was masterful creating ingenious analogies to explain ideas; making the whole thing a delicious read.
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) PDF
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) EPub
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) Doc
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) iBooks
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) rtf
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) Mobipocket
Meditations on First Philosophy (Hackett Classics) Kindle
